Jose-H808 - The eLearning professional - PDP Form (MyStuff) at 25-10-08

30 Oct 2008, 12:48

Visible to all Open University users

Saturday, October 25th, 2008, 5:17 AM

Jose-H808 - The eLearning professional - PDP Form (MyStuff) at 25-10-08
Training or development
Title for training or development Jose-H808 - The eLearning professional - PDP Form (MyStuff) at 25-10-08
Organisation or provider OU
Type training course
From date 06/09/2008
To date 25/01/2009
Ongoing Ongoing
Actions and dates to action
Action / Date
Outcomes
Learning objectives
• Familiarise self with debate about learning objects including respositories, metadata and IMS standards
• Gain insight into guiding online discussions and key factors for developing online communities
• Try out more audio-visual tools such as Skype (eg Netmeeting)
• Familiarise self with a variety of models for elearning
• Gain further ideas for online activities and an awareness for situations where they would be appropriate
• Look into how sensitive and critical comments are given to others (students and tutors) in an online environment, improve own techniques
• Familiarise self with some of the research behind elearning
• Try out a selection of common elearning platforms
• Familiarise self with methods for tackling plagiarism and digital copyright issues
• Look into ways online games are used in learning
• Develop working knowledge of, and ability to effectively use, key elearning technologies (e.g. eportfolios, wikis, blogs, learning journals, etc.)
• Improve, and document, own Critical Personal Reflection

Skills and/or expertise developed
• First experience with:
- (Skills) an eportfolio: MyStuff (Ongoing)
producing eportfolio items
tagging items
filling out first Training and Development Form
- (Skills) electronically annotating a pdf file (Unit 3)
- (Skills) creating a Local Area Network (LAN) (Unit 3)
- (Skills) editing a wiki (Unit 4)
- (Skills) making and publishing a podcast (Unit 4)
- (Skills) adding subtitles to video (Unit 4)
- (Skills) using a mind-mapping tool: FreeMind (Unit 4)
- (Skills/Proactivity) producing HowTo guides (Unit 4)
- (Proactivity) attempting to lead, inform or otherwise motivate others in an elearning context (Ongoing)

• Continuing experience with:
- (Skills) using and publishing a blog (Ongoing)
- (Skills/Proactivity) using/collaborating in online forums (Ongoing)
- (Skills) editing video (Unit 4)
- (Reflection) critical self-reflection (Ongoing)
- (Critique) analysis and critique of the practice of others (Ongoing)
- (Proactivity) attempting to lead, inform or otherwise motivate others (Ongoing)


General
Notes A lot of the above taken from:
- Barritt, O. (2008) "MOADE - H808 The Elearning professional", shared MyStuff item, (accessed 25th October 2008)
- Open University, (2008) "H808-Assignment guide 2008.pdf", (accessed 3rd October 2008)
- Open University, (2008) "H808-Course-guide-08.pdf", (accessed 3rd October 2008)
- Stan, M. (2008) "Personal development Objectives for H808", shared MyStuff item, accessed 25th October 2008
Tagged with H808 . PDP . training and development . reflection . skills . proactivity . critique .

1 comments
Alan Clarke on Sunday, October 26th, 2008, 11:29 PM says (privately)

Hi Jose

A well presented and detailed plan - it is clearly ambitous in the range and scale of the objectives - however, it demonstrates enthusiasm and motivation. You have tried to identify skills and knowledge already acquired through the course amd acknowledge sources. A very good effort

Cheers

Alan

CA2.4-Criteria for reflective writing

[<-- Click on the image to enlarge in the same window, then use the browser "back" button. Or open in separate tab or window]

4 Oct 2008, 11:54

Visible to all Open University users

Jose Martel-H808-CA2.4-Criteria for reflective writing

-In good reflective writing you need to describe what happened/what the issue was AND THEN write down HOW that made you feel (i.e. your reflections):

- Description provides context

- Reflections share meaning (PSU, 2006).

- Try to work systematically:

- chose what you want to reflect on

- write:

- what happened, try to keep to the facts, be precise (include enough detail)

- how you felt about this

- about the various things this could mean, to you, and to others

- what the consequences are, immediate and future

- as you write:

- ask yourself questions

- answer those questions

- try to see things from

- a different point of view

- the point of view of other people involved

- think about how past events may have influenced

- what happened

- your reactions to it

- other peoples' reactions to it

- compare these with your own reactions

- perhaps

- initially

- consider the details, the "small picture"

- then

- stand back, consider the "big picture"

- think about

- what you can learn from

- what happened

- your ongoing reflections

- what conclusions you can draw

- and the reasons why

- specific evidence

- to validate your conclusions

- already in your eportfolio (or that could be included)

- be honest

- tell the truth as you

- see it

- feel it

- try not to censor yourself

- be creative when looking for alternative solutions

- brainstorm; mind-map, etc.

- but don't be too fanciful with the results

- use

- an honest, upbeat, sincere tone

- short paragraphs starting with

- topic sentences, e.g.

- "From Jack's point of view nothing had changed."

- "The next day, I tried again."

- "Despite their assurances, nothing was the same any more."

- transition words, e.g.

- Besides; For example; Since; Thus; In order to; However; Overall (Moon, 2001; PSU, 2006)

References

Moon, J. (2001) ‘PDP working paper 4: reflection in higher education learning’ [online], The Higher Education Academy. Available from: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/resources/resourcedatabase/id72_Reflection_in_Higher_Education_Learning.rtf (accessed 29 June 2007).

Penn State University (PSU) (2006) REFLECT: providing insight, http://portfolio.psu.edu/reflect (accessed 1 July 2008).

CA2.1-Applications of eportfolios

2 Oct 2008, 23:33

Visible to all Open University users

Page 1 of 3http://learn.open.ac.uk/mod/resourcepage/view.php?id=90944

1. Read at least three of the papers listed in the resources section below.
Alternatively, find other case studies on the web that reflect your particular
interests. Consider the following issues:
a. Are eportfolios fulfilling a genuine need or are they just the latest fad?
b. Is personal development planning (PDP) different for students than for staff?
c. Of the various aspects of eportfolio use (e.g. collecting material,
providing evidence for learning, reflection on learning, presentation of
learning), which do the case studies exemplify?

-After (finally) finishing the essay, I reread the brief and noticed I hadn't really addressed b, or c at all. In fact I find it hard to answer c coz don't all eoportfolios have all those aspects? Though I suppose some acounts may emphasise some aspects more than others.

-Btw, I use "eportfolio" in the sense that it's an electronic portfolio, used for PDP/CPD, that is web based.

-Yes, I didn't put the ref list at the end...

-------------------------

Jose Martel-CA2.1-Applications of eportfolios
542 words (below)

If eportfolios are to be used for life-long learning and not be more than an expensive fad - expensive financially and, I think more importantly, costly in terms of wasted opportunity for all stakeholders - then a number of critical issues must be addressed.

There are technological issues. Effective implementation and integration of the eportfolio project within existing systems must be ensured. The various eportfolio platforms that arise must be interoperable, with data file technology used in current eportfolios not becoming obsolete. The ease and range of manipulation of this data (and meta data) is essential for enduser acceptance and institutional or corporate assessment and developmental needs (Batson, 2002; Jafari 2004).

Whether the costly technological issues can be addressed may be related to the implementation of a sound business plan to safeguard the continued existence, maintenance and development of the eportfolio platform. This business plan and platform may envisage, promote and depend on the enduser's desire for, and ability to easily and cost effectively maintain, lifelong affiliation with a particular eportfolio/institution. In return for lifelong endorsement, the enduser must receive an attractive package of benefits which could include (the benefits derived from the) use of the institution's name and artifact authentication (Jafari, 2004).

Aside from technological and business related issues, there are academic or pedagogic concerns. There are signs that a cultural change is needed in teachers' rather negative attitudes towards the concept of reflection, and their current unwillingness to reflect on their own practice and develop it - an issue related to excellence in teaching and Continuing Professional Development (CPD). A teacher's self-reflection and professional development (through the use of CPD and Teaching ePortfolios) can form a crucial model of good practice for a student's own reflective and developmental behaviour, greatly influencing the student's Personal Development Planing (PDP) (Stefani, 2005). The cultural shift in teachers' attitudes to reflection can be accomplished over a number of years as the 5 levels of maturation required for effective implementation of eportfolios are gradually achieved, maintained and surpassed until the final level is attained. This final level would be marked by the use of "authentic evidence as authoritative evidence for assessment, evaluation, and reporting" within the eportfolio, which is largely constructed employing the student's heuristic processes, and which would be "of high value for students, educators, and employers" (Love, et al. 2004).

Despite the apparent overwhelming acceptance of the need for PDP, CPD and eportfolios, concerns have been raised that there is a lack of evidence to support the claims that eportfolios support and enhance student learning and promote reflection on learning (Stefani, 2005). Further, appropriately documented studies, and time will tell.


As to eportfolio aspects that the case studies I looked at exemplify, the account of the University of Auckland's eportfolio project (Stefani, 2005) seems to stress the initial importance of the eportfolio as repository, while emphasizing that manipulation of the data/succesive versions of (the same) artifacts can demonstrate reflection and improvement over time.

The account of the California Lutheran University’s School of Education's eportfolio project (Love, et al. 2004) seemed to stress the effectiveness of working through the levels of maturation, and comments on how that gradual implementation aided its implementation by permitting the qualitative changes in faculty reflection so necessary for student progress.

CA2.1-eportfolios-my interest

1 Oct 2008, 20:29

Edited by Jose Martel Penate, 1 Oct 2008, 20:34

Visible to all Open University users

As already stated elsewhere, my reasons for learning about eportfolios are career related - in that this knowledge/skill will, hopefully, further and broaden my future employability. However, I have no immediate need, requirement, or real opportunity to put my new expertise to any practical use. This means that my interest in eportfolios is purely academic at the moment (no pun intended...but left in).

This, at times, rather laboured intrinsic interest is in stark contrast to the healthier extrinsic motivation that pushes some of my fellow students to enthuse about, delight in, and, more importantly, relate to their studies. Vague, general interest cannot match actual need. But I plod on.

I have hardly started experimenting with our eportfolio, Mystuff. This is mainly because I find it so annoying to use. I keep reading about how it is vital for the individual to feel in control of the eportfolio environment and be able to individualise it, or else they will quickly lose interest. Is Mystuff the OU's attempt to help us deep-learn by doing? Oh, we can intellectualise, we can assimilate the theory, but one learns so much more profoundly if one emotionalises - is there anything quite as effective as actually experiencing the frustration!?

But now that I am reading Stefani (2005) discuss CPD in a higher education context, I do feel that I could use an eportfolio (that does not annoy me) to help motivate myself; help me reflect, perhaps, more effectively; and help counteract the apathy that sets in when working in an education system where, though excellence in teaching is paid lip service, entertainment value rules.

Jose

Attempted focused musing and rumination 2

29 Sep 2008, 22:51

Edited by Jose Martel Penate, 29 Sep 2008, 23:19

Visible to all Open University users

- ePortfolios:
___- are they information overload?
______- who (really) needs all that info (for their entire life)?
_________- anyone
____________- to keep life-events organised and searchable
____________- to help plan life-options
_________- only some people
____________- life is messy, not organised
___- positive for people who are successful
______- eportfolio as celebration
___- negative (?) for people who are not successful
______- constant and focused reminder of their failings
______- future headline?: eportfolio use linked to surge in suicides
___- what are they a true reflection of;
______- who we are?
______- who we want to appear to be?
______- who we want to be?
______- who someone else wants us to (appear to) be?
______- all of the above?
______- the state of our mental health??
___- is it safe to have all that personal data in one place and online?
______- but not only in 1 place
_________- platform management will have backup copies elsewhere geographically
_________- individuals will keep their own backup copies
______- identity theft (see below)
______- Big Brother (aspects in Orwell not Ch4)
_________- civil rights conspiracy theorists
____________- government could have too much access to too much personal data
_______________- but the usual responses
__________________- why would they bother?
__________________- data will be password protected and super-duper encrypted
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(Have I mentioned how much I hate that this blog messes up my formatting?!)

Thankfully still pre-Gattaca - a reply to a forum post

29 Sep 2008, 03:08

Edited by Jose Martel Penate, 29 Sep 2008, 03:40

Visible to all Open University users

A reply to the post by:
From: Philippa Perry 2 28 September 2008 15:39:44
Subject: ePortfolio focus
To: H808 ac6 UNIT 2


Hi Philippa (and the rest of the group),

I've also been looking or hoping for more balance in our reading, so I'm glad to find your reasoned, "sceptical" point of view.

From my non-techie standpoint, I'm not concerned about problems of interoperability. To me it seems to make financial sense for major platform developers to work towards industry standards, though this may not prevent niche-market technology having compatibility issues. I'd agree with Jafari (2004) in saying that the main (technological) issue is ensuring that the eportfolio interface is one that the average enduser will want to use. This means complete integration with other school/university/company systems; transferability of data; and perhaps lifelong accessibility, among others.

An interesting and, I think, important point you've raised - one that I haven't come across in my (limited) reading, or even really thought about - is that of the effectiveness of the eportfolio as a recruiting tool. I had wondered about issues of artifact authenticity - which could be met with a lifelong university eportfolio address (Jafari 2004), but what happens when a student does a Masters or PHD at a different university or when the student enters employment, will they need a different eportfolio address, and different eportpolios, for each institution/company, thus defeating the ideal of a centralised repository of information? However, you focus on the employer's need to find truth/specific answers/the real warts and all underbelly amongst all the lies(?) and disinformation/prepared responses/dazzling presentations that most potential employees will attempt to fabricate.

I'm still unsure how eportfolios will prove to be more useful to most employers. Right now CVs can be 2 or 3 A4 pages long plus cover letter, and employers may receive tens even hundreds of CVs for each post. How much time would the employer/HR department give each CV? How much time would the employer/HR department want to give each CV!? Now, how much time would that employer/HR department need to invest in order to examine each creative, wonderfully presented, multimedia eportfolio? Could the employer/HR department be sure that time invested would produce sufficient/worthwhile returns?

Perhaps this problem may lead to the development of eportfolio scanning technology that can, in fractions of a second, automatically select a manageable shortlist of candidates' eportfolio applications - from a possibly huge and impossibly time-consuming list - thus selecting, and more worryingly, rejecting candidates without a human ever viewing their meticulously complied life story.

I think there is a general consensus that eportfolios can be an invaluable aid to learning, but perhaps HR departments may still favour CVs for most work placements. At least until efficient, cost-effective, eportfolio scanning technology comes on the market...or DNA testing becomes legal.

Jose

Metacog-what??!

25 Sep 2008, 23:29

Edited by Jose Martel Penate, 26 Sep 2008, 00:02

Visible to all Open University users

Before starting H808 I had no idea what PDP (as "PDP") or eportfolios were.

A few years ago I did an art and design foundation course and for the first, and only, time put together a portfolio - a showcase portfolio for my interviews at universities/art colleges. Now, having done some reading on both subjects, I can see that my uni tutors did employ techniques aimed at helping me to "own"/take responsibility for my learning, though I don't recall them ever clearly stating that that was what they were doing; it was simply that that was the way things were done and I, as a student, followed their lead. And the closest thing to eportfolios we had were the sketchbooks for ideas and work in progress that all students kept.

So, this is all new to me. And, as a teacher of English as a foreign language, I'm actually quite surprised that I have never heard of PDP and eportfolios (or even the use of portfolios in education) before. Though it may simply be the case that I had no (reason to take an) interest in them so I took no notice of them (in my wanderings about the internet and various books on teaching methodology). Now that I am sitting up and taking notice I can see that there is this (huge?) movement extolling the virtues of PDP and eportfolios.

Is this all just a fad? I hope not, and I would think not. (Rigorous?) Studies have shown that PDP - systematically thinking about and then planning one's own learning, life, future - does (significantly?) improve an individual's motivation, and thus, participation in their own learning/development. I've always been a contemplative kind of person so this idea of reflection-helping-development isn't a hard one for me to buy into (hmmm, looks like I also need to use the word "metacognition": awareness and understanding of one's own thought processes).

But of course, all because something is a good idea doesn't mean that everyone will do it. Could the difficulties involved in integrating PDPs/eportfolios into the various academic/work environments tend to turn potential users (academic institution/employers) away? I suppose that when governments get involved and issue policy that should or must be adhered to, then problems will get solved or circumvented. In the business world, I imagine that if CDP programs result in greater productivity/profit then we'll see an increase in their use.

Are there nay-sayers? I've only read papers "for" PDPs and eportfolios. Obviously the OU/H808 are "for". What do the people "against" say??

To be continued...